Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests: Provide local define of min() and max()
From: Mahmoud Matook <hidden>
Date: 2023-08-26 09:46:27
Also in:
linux-kselftest, lkml, netdev
On 08/25, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023, Mahmoud Maatuq wrote:quoted
to avoid manual calculation of min and max values and fix coccinelle warnings such WARNING opportunity for min()/max() adding one common definition that could be used in multiple files under selftests. there are also some defines for min/max scattered locally inside sources under selftests. this also prepares for cleaning up those redundant defines and include kselftest.h instead. Signed-off-by: Mahmoud Maatuq <redacted> Suggested-by: David Laight <redacted> --- changes in v2: redefine min/max in a more strict way to avoid signedness mismatch and multiple evaluation. is_signed_type() moved from selftests/kselftest_harness.h to selftests/kselftest.h. --- tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++Heh, reminds me of https://xkcd.com/927. All of these #defines are available in tools/include/linux/kernel.h, and it's trivially easy for selftests to add all of tools/include to their include path. I don't see any reason for the selftests framework to define yet another version, just fix the individual tests.
giving the reviews seems that patchset is useless. still a confusing point for me; after adding tools/include to the include path of selftes how we can differentaite between #include <linux/kernel.h> that under tools/include and one under usr/include. _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees