Thread (24 messages) 24 messages, 3 authors, 2021-08-19
STALE1797d

[PATCH v3 3/9] drm: check for null master in drm_is_current_master_locked

From: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-18 07:40:46
Also in: dri-devel, intel-gfx, linux-media, lkml
Subsystem: drm drivers, drm drivers and misc gpu patches, the rest · Maintainers: David Airlie, Simona Vetter, Maarten Lankhorst, Maxime Ripard, Thomas Zimmermann, Linus Torvalds

There is a window after calling drm_master_release, and before a file
is freed, where drm_file can have is_master set to true, but both the
drm_file and drm_device have no master.

This could result in wrongly approving permissions in
drm_is_current_master_locked. Add a check that fpriv->master is
non-NULl to guard against this scenario.

Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <redacted>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
index 8c0e0dba1611..f9267b21556e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c
@@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ static bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv)
 	lockdep_assert_once(lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_lookup_lock) ||
 			    lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex));
 
-	return fpriv->is_master && drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == fpriv->minor->dev->master;
+	return (fpriv->is_master && fpriv->master &&
+		drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == fpriv->minor->dev->master);
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help