On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 01:44:01PM +0530, Utkarsh Verma wrote:
Instead of a direct assignment, use pci_irq_vector() to get the
Linux IRQ number.
Why is this needed?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Signed-off-by: Utkarsh Verma <redacted>
---
drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mid.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mid.c b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mid.c
index efa0515139f8..3a279ce0e904 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mid.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_mid.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static int mid8250_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct pci_device_id *id)
memset(&uart, 0, sizeof(struct uart_8250_port));
uart.port.dev = &pdev->dev;
- uart.port.irq = pdev->irq;
+ uart.port.irq = pci_irq_vector(pdev, 0);
What problem does this solve?
Do not describe what you are doing, but rather, _why_ you are doing it.
thanks,
greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees