[Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 net] rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()
From: Anmol Karn <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-19 19:11:35
Also in:
linux-hams, lkml, netdev
Subsystem:
networking [general], the rest · Maintainers:
"David S. Miller", Eric Dumazet, Jakub Kicinski, Paolo Abeni, Linus Torvalds
rose_send_frame() dereferences `neigh->dev` when called from
rose_transmit_clear_request(), and the first occurrence of the
`neigh` is in rose_loopback_timer() as `rose_loopback_neigh`,
and it is initialized in rose_add_loopback_neigh() as NULL.
i.e when `rose_loopback_neigh` used in rose_loopback_timer()
its `->dev` was still NULL and rose_loopback_timer() was calling
rose_rx_call_request() without checking for NULL.
- net/rose/rose_link.c
This bug seems to get triggered in this line:
rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh->dev->dev_addr;
Fix it by adding NULL checking for `rose_loopback_neigh->dev`
in rose_loopback_timer().
Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3
Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn <redacted>
---
Changes in v5:
- Free `dev` in rose_rx_call_request() and add NULL check for `dev` before freeing it.
(Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref])
Changes in v4:
- Free `dev`(on dev_hold()), when neigh->dev is NULL. (Suggested-by: Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref])
Changes in v3:
- Corrected checkpatch warnings and errors (Suggested-by: Saeed Mahameed [off-list ref])
- Added "Fixes:" tag (Suggested-by: Saeed Mahameed [off-list ref])
Changes in v2:
- Added NULL check in rose_loopback_timer() (Suggested-by: Greg KH [off-list ref])
net/rose/rose_loopback.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rose/rose_loopback.c b/net/rose/rose_loopback.c
index 7b094275ea8b..11c45c8c6c16 100644
--- a/net/rose/rose_loopback.c
+++ b/net/rose/rose_loopback.c@@ -96,10 +96,19 @@ static void rose_loopback_timer(struct timer_list *unused) } if (frametype == ROSE_CALL_REQUEST) { - if ((dev = rose_dev_get(dest)) != NULL) { - if (rose_rx_call_request(skb, dev, rose_loopback_neigh, lci_o) == 0) - kfree_skb(skb); - } else { + if (!rose_loopback_neigh->dev) { + kfree_skb(skb); + continue; + } + + dev = rose_dev_get(dest); + if (!dev) { + kfree_skb(skb); + continue; + } + + if (rose_rx_call_request(skb, dev, rose_loopback_neigh, lci_o) == 0) { + dev_put(dev); kfree_skb(skb); } } else { --
2.29.2 _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees