Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2020-07-28

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v2] ata: use generic power management

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date: 2020-07-28 15:51:37
Also in: linux-ide, lkml

On 7/27/20 11:17 PM, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 02:30:03PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
On 7/27/20 12:11 PM, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:59:05AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
On 7/27/20 11:51 AM, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:42:51AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
quoted
On 7/27/20 11:40 AM, Vaibhav Gupta wrote:
Yes, I agree. Actually with previous drivers, I was able to get help
from maintainers and/or supporters for the hardware testing. Is that
possible for this patch?
It might be, you'll have to ask people to help you, very rarely do people
just test patches unsolicited unless they have some sort of interest in the
feature.

This is all part of what it takes to get code upstream. Writing the code
is just a small part of it, the bigger part is usually getting it tested
and providing some assurance that you are willing to fix issues when/if
they come up.

You might want to consider splitting up the patchset a bit - you could
have one patch for the generic bits, then one for each chipset. That
would allow you to at least get some of the work upstream, once tested.
I think I can break this patch into one commit per driver. The reason that
all updates got into one single patch is that I made
ata_pci_device_suspend/resume() static and exported just the
ata_pci_device_pm_ops variable. Thus, all the driver using .suspend/.resume()
had to be updated in a single patch.

First I will make changes in drivers/ata/libata-core.c, but won't make any
function static. Thus, each driver can be updated in independent commits
without breaking anything. And then in the last commit, I can hide the
unnecessary .suspend()/.resume() callbacks. This will create patch-series of 55
or 56 patches.

Will this approach work?
That should work, but more importantly, ensure you get some folks signed up
for testing this functionality.

-- 
Jens Axboe

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help