Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 4 authors, 2020-07-20

Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH 1/14 v3] IB/hfi1: Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_*()

From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Date: 2020-07-13 17:09:45
Also in: linux-rdma, lkml

On Mon, Jul 13, 2020 at 07:55:25PM +0200, Saheed O. Bolarinwa wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
From: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <redacted>

On failure pcie_capability_read_dword() sets it's last parameter,
val to 0. In this case dn and up will be 0, so aspm_hw_l1_supported()
will return false.
However, with Patch 14/14, it is possible that val is set to ~0 on
failure. This would introduce a bug because (x & x) == (~0 & x). So with
dn and up being 0x02, a true value is return when the read has actually
failed.

This bug can be avoided if the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword
is checked to confirm success. The behaviour of the function remains
intact.

Check the return value of pcie_capability_read_dword() to ensure success.

Suggested-by: Bjorn Helgaas <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Bolarinwa Olayemi Saheed <redacted>
 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c | 7 ++++---
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
index a3c53be4072c..80d0b3edd983 100644
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/aspm.c
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ static bool aspm_hw_l1_supported(struct hfi1_devdata *dd)
 {
 	struct pci_dev *parent = dd->pcidev->bus->self;
 	u32 up, dn;
+	int ret_up, ret_dn;
 
 	/*
 	 * If the driver does not have access to the upstream component,
@@ -32,14 +33,14 @@ static bool aspm_hw_l1_supported(struct hfi1_devdata *dd)
 	if (!parent)
 		return false;
 
-	pcie_capability_read_dword(dd->pcidev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &dn);
+	ret_dn = pcie_capability_read_dword(dd->pcidev, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &dn);
 	dn = ASPM_L1_SUPPORTED(dn);
 
-	pcie_capability_read_dword(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &up);
+	ret_up = pcie_capability_read_dword(parent, PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, &up);
 	up = ASPM_L1_SUPPORTED(up);
 
 	/* ASPM works on A-step but is reported as not supported */
-	return (!!dn || is_ax(dd)) && !!up;
+	return !!ret_dn && !!ret_up && (!!dn || is_ax(dd)) && !!up;
 }
what is all the !! for? boolean contexts already coerce to boolean

Jason
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help