Thread (22 messages) 22 messages, 7 authors, 2014-09-16

Re: [PATCH 0/3] Implement /proc/built-in file similar to /proc/modules

From: Richard Weinberger <hidden>
Date: 2014-09-14 18:12:48
Also in: lkml

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Kirill Tkhai [off-list ref] wrote:
On 14.09.2014 21:27, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
quoted
On 09/14, Greg KH wrote:
quoted
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 02:18:13PM +0400, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
quoted
This series implements a possibility to show the list of built-in drivers
to userspace. The names of drivers will be the same as when they are modules.
Have you looked at /sys/modules/ ?  Doesn't that show what you want
here?
Well, /sys/module/ doesn't list the modules (drivers) compiled in. Say,
/sys/module/kernel. And it can't help a user to figure out that, say, the
loop driver is already "loaded" because CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LOOP=y.
quoted
Module names aren't "standardized", we change them at times when needed,
just like CONFIG_ names.
OK, but still the name will be the same, in /proc/modules or /proc/builtin.
quoted
What is your end goal here?  As you say, config.gz is the real kernel
configuration, just having a list of modules built in isn't going to
help much in getting a working kernel config without it.
Perhaps you are right... but otoh perhaps this can can be useful anyway.
Again, a user can know about "insmod loop", but he can know nothing
about CONFIG_ names.

That said, I do not really understand 2/3. Not only I do not understand
this kbuild magic, I am not sure I understand what /proc/built-in will
actually show.
It's a list of drivers, one driver per line:
Built-in modules or drivers? :-)

-- 
Thanks,
//richard
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help