On 27.7.2011 06:35, Randy Dunlap wrote:

On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:42:04 -0400 Arnaud Lacombe wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Arnaud Lacombe[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Randy Dunlap[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

I guess I prefer your ENABLED() syntax then.

we need to be careful about namespace pollution/collision.

For the sake of having numbers:

% git grep -w ENABLED . | wc -l
     116
% git grep -w CONFIGURED . | wc -l
      11
% git grep -w KCONFIG . | wc -l
       1

OK.  Then I would go back to a predicate like the original patch had,
e.g.:
	IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_NUMA)

Good idea. Is anyone against
IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_FOO)
IS_ENABLED_BUILTIN(CONFIG_FOO)
IS_ENABLED_MODULE(CONFIG_FOO)
?

Michal