Re: [GIT] kbuild fixes for 3.0
From: maximilian attems <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-10 10:03:42
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:53:34PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Beside that, no matter what, you are about to break `/usr/sbin/sensors-detect' (from my Fedora 14), which rely on a 3 digits version number:Is there really any compelling technical reason to _not_ have Linus release the kernels with a superfluous .0 on the end, with the understanding that the -stable team gets to increment it for their future releases? It'd make every kernel.org release exactly three dotted decimals from here on out, which certainly simplifies things. It seems like we're just borrowing trouble here by trying to drop it down to two numbers. (Not, mind you, that I give a damn at all one way or the other, but it feels like you all are going to be spending a lot of time tripping over poor assumptions in userspace rather than doing actual work.)
you have forgotten the rule that linus himself is allowed to break userland. :P in Debian an three digit 3.0.0 release would also be very much appreciated as dpkg will order wrongly 3.0.0~rcX to 3.0. -- maks