Thread (18 messages) 18 messages, 8 authors, 2011-06-10

Re: [GIT] kbuild fixes for 3.0

From: maximilian attems <hidden>
Date: 2011-06-10 10:03:42
Also in: lkml

On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:53:34PM -0700, Ray Lee wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:16 PM, Arnaud Lacombe [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Beside that, no matter what, you are about to break
`/usr/sbin/sensors-detect' (from my Fedora 14), which rely on a 3
digits version number:
Is there really any compelling technical reason to _not_ have Linus
release the kernels with a superfluous .0 on the end, with the
understanding that the -stable team gets to increment it for their
future releases? It'd make every kernel.org release exactly three
dotted decimals from here on out, which certainly simplifies things.

It seems like we're just borrowing trouble here by trying to drop it
down to two numbers.

(Not, mind you, that I give a damn at all one way or the other, but it
feels like you all are going to be spending a lot of time tripping
over poor assumptions in userspace rather than doing actual work.)
you have forgotten the rule that linus himself is allowed to break userland. :P

in Debian an three digit 3.0.0 release would also be very much appreciated as
dpkg will order wrongly 3.0.0~rcX to 3.0.

-- 
maks
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help