Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 7 authors, 2023-08-03

Re: [PATCH 1/1] tpm: disable hwrng for fTPM on some AMD designs

From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: 2023-08-01 19:10:08
Also in: lkml, stable

On Tue Aug 1, 2023 at 9:42 PM EEST, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Tue, 1 Aug 2023 at 11:28, Jarkko Sakkinen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I would disable it inside tpm_crb driver, which is the driver used
for fTPM's: they are identified by MSFT0101 ACPI identifier.

I think the right scope is still AMD because we don't have such
regressions with Intel fTPM.
I'm ok with that.
quoted
I.e. I would move the helper I created inside tpm_crb driver, and
a new flag, let's say "TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HWRNG_DISABLED", which tpm_crb
sets before calling tpm_chip_register().

Finally, tpm_add_hwrng() needs the following invariant:

        if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_HWRNG_DISABLED)
                return 0;

How does this sound? I can refine this quickly from my first trial.
Sounds fine.
Mario, it would be good if you could send a fix candidate but take my
suggestion for a new TPM chip flag into account, while doing it. Please
send it as a separate patch, not attachment to this thread.

I can test and ack it, if it looks reasonable.
My only worry comes from my ignorance: do these fTPM devices *always*
end up being enumerated through CRB, or do they potentially look
"normal enough" that you can actually end up using them even without
having that CRB driver loaded?
I know that QEMU has TPM passthrough but I don't know how it behaves
exactly.
Put another way: is the CRB driver the _only_ way they are visible, or
could some people hit on this through the TPM TIS interface if they
have CRB disabled?
I'm not aware of such implementations.
I see, for example, that qemu ends up emulating the TIS layer, and it
might end up forwarding the TPM requests to something that is natively
CRB?

But again: I don't know enough about CRB vs TIS, so the above may be a
stupid question.

           Linus
I would focus exactly what is known not to work and disable exactly
that.

If someone still wants to enable TPM on such hardware, we can later
on add a kernel command-line flag to enforce hwrng. This ofc based
on user feedback, not something I would add right now.

BR, Jarkko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help