Re: [PATCH v5 15/16] ima: Move dentries into ima_namespace
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-12-09 15:01:25
Also in:
linux-security-module, lkml
On 12/9/21 09:41, Christian Brauner wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:37:49PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:quoted
On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 03:34:28PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:quoted
On Wed, Dec 08, 2021 at 05:18:17PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:quoted
Move the dentries into the ima_namespace for reuse by virtualized SecurityFS. Implement function freeing the dentries in order of files and symlinks before directories. Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> ---This doesn't work as implemented, I think. What I would have preferred and what I tried to explain in the earlier review was: Keep the dentry stashing global since it is only needed for init_ima_ns. Then struct ima_namespace becomes way smaller and simpler. If you do that then it makes sense to remove the additional dget() in securityfs_create_dentry() for non-init_ima_ns. Then you can rely on auto-cleanup in .kill_sb() or on ima_securityfs_init() failure and you only need to call ima_fs_ns_free_dentries() if ns != init_ima_ns.s/ns != init_ima_ns/ns == init_ima_ns/quoted
quoted
IIuc, it seems you're currently doing one dput() too many since you're calling securityfs_remove() in the error path for non-init_ima_ns which relies on the previous increased dget() which we removed.
I thought that securityfs_remove() will now simply influence when a dentry is removed and freed. If we call it in the error cleanup path in non-init_user_ns case it would go away right there and leave nothing to do for .kill_sb() while an additional dget() would require the cleanup as well but do another cleanup then in .kill_sb() since that brings the reference count to 0 via the dput()s that it does. Am I wrong on this?
quoted
If you really want to move the dentry stashing into struct ima_namespace even though it's really unnecessary then you may as well not care about the auto-cleanup and keep that additional ima_fs_ns_free_dentries(ns) call in .kill_sb(). But I really think not dragging dentry stashing into struct ima_namespace is the correct way to go about this.
I moved the dentries into the ima_namespace so that each namespace holds a pointer to the dentries it owns and isolates them. We certainly wouldn't want to have IMA namespaces write over the current static variables and create a mess with what these are pointing to ( https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c#L359 ) and possible race conditions when doing parallel initialization (if that's possible at all). This also reduces the code size and we don't need two different implementations for init_user_ns and non-init_user_ns. So I don't quite understand whey we wouldn't want to have the dentries isolated via ima_namespace?
quoted
quoted
quoted
include/linux/ima.h | 13 ++++++ security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++--------------- 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)diff --git a/include/linux/ima.h b/include/linux/ima.h index 3aaf6e806db4..4dd64e318b15 100644 --- a/include/linux/ima.h +++ b/include/linux/ima.h@@ -220,6 +220,17 @@ struct ima_h_table { struct hlist_head queue[IMA_MEASURE_HTABLE_SIZE]; }; +enum { + IMAFS_DENTRY_DIR = 0, + IMAFS_DENTRY_SYMLINK, + IMAFS_DENTRY_BINARY_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS, + IMAFS_DENTRY_ASCII_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS, + IMAFS_DENTRY_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS_COUNT, + IMAFS_DENTRY_VIOLATIONS, + IMAFS_DENTRY_IMA_POLICY, + IMAFS_DENTRY_LAST +}; + struct ima_namespace { struct kref kref; struct user_namespace *user_ns;@@ -266,6 +277,8 @@ struct ima_namespace { struct mutex ima_write_mutex; unsigned long ima_fs_flags; int valid_policy; + + struct dentry *dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_LAST]; }; extern struct ima_namespace init_ima_ns;diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c index a749a3e79304..3810d11fb463 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c@@ -360,14 +360,6 @@ static ssize_t ima_write_policy(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, return result; } -static struct dentry *ima_dir; -static struct dentry *ima_symlink; -static struct dentry *binary_runtime_measurements; -static struct dentry *ascii_runtime_measurements; -static struct dentry *runtime_measurements_count; -static struct dentry *violations; -static struct dentry *ima_policy; - enum ima_fs_flags { IMA_FS_BUSY, };@@ -437,8 +429,8 @@ static int ima_release_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *file) ima_update_policy(ns); #if !defined(CONFIG_IMA_WRITE_POLICY) && !defined(CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY) - securityfs_remove(ima_policy); - ima_policy = NULL; + securityfs_remove(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_IMA_POLICY]); + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_IMA_POLICY] = NULL; #elif defined(CONFIG_IMA_WRITE_POLICY) clear_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ns->ima_fs_flags); #elif defined(CONFIG_IMA_READ_POLICY)@@ -455,58 +447,72 @@ static const struct file_operations ima_measure_policy_ops = { .llseek = generic_file_llseek, }; -int __init ima_fs_init(void) +static void ima_fs_ns_free_dentries(struct ima_namespace *ns) { - ima_dir = securityfs_create_dir("ima", integrity_dir); - if (IS_ERR(ima_dir)) + int i; + + for (i = IMAFS_DENTRY_LAST - 1; i >= 0; i--) + securityfs_remove(ns->dentry[i]); + + memset(ns->dentry, 0, sizeof(ns->dentry)); +} + +static int __init ima_securityfs_init(struct user_namespace *user_ns) +{ + struct ima_namespace *ns = user_ns->ima_ns; + struct dentry *ima_dir; + + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_DIR] = securityfs_create_dir("ima", integrity_dir); + if (IS_ERR(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_DIR])) return -1; + ima_dir = ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_DIR]; - ima_symlink = securityfs_create_symlink("ima", NULL, "integrity/ima", - NULL); - if (IS_ERR(ima_symlink)) + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_SYMLINK] = + securityfs_create_symlink("ima", NULL, "integrity/ima", NULL); + if (IS_ERR(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_SYMLINK])) goto out; - binary_runtime_measurements = + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_BINARY_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS] = securityfs_create_file("binary_runtime_measurements", S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, &ima_measurements_ops); - if (IS_ERR(binary_runtime_measurements)) + if (IS_ERR(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_BINARY_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS])) goto out; - ascii_runtime_measurements = + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_ASCII_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS] = securityfs_create_file("ascii_runtime_measurements", S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, &ima_ascii_measurements_ops); - if (IS_ERR(ascii_runtime_measurements)) + if (IS_ERR(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_ASCII_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS])) goto out; - runtime_measurements_count = + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS_COUNT] = securityfs_create_file("runtime_measurements_count", S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, &ima_measurements_count_ops); - if (IS_ERR(runtime_measurements_count)) + if (IS_ERR(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_RUNTIME_MEASUREMENTS_COUNT])) goto out; - violations = + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_VIOLATIONS] = securityfs_create_file("violations", S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP, ima_dir, NULL, &ima_htable_violations_ops); - if (IS_ERR(violations)) + if (IS_ERR(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_VIOLATIONS])) goto out; - ima_policy = securityfs_create_file("policy", POLICY_FILE_FLAGS, + ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_IMA_POLICY] = + securityfs_create_file("policy", POLICY_FILE_FLAGS, ima_dir, NULL, &ima_measure_policy_ops); - if (IS_ERR(ima_policy)) + if (IS_ERR(ns->dentry[IMAFS_DENTRY_IMA_POLICY])) goto out; return 0; out: - securityfs_remove(violations); - securityfs_remove(runtime_measurements_count); - securityfs_remove(ascii_runtime_measurements); - securityfs_remove(binary_runtime_measurements); - securityfs_remove(ima_symlink); - securityfs_remove(ima_dir); - securityfs_remove(ima_policy); + ima_fs_ns_free_dentries(ns); return -1; } + +int __init ima_fs_init(void) +{ + return ima_securityfs_init(&init_user_ns); +}-- 2.31.1