Thread (23 messages) 23 messages, 4 authors, 2021-12-02

Re: [PATCH 0/4] ima: support fs-verity signatures stored as

From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-11-30 12:56:37
Also in: linux-fscrypt, lkml

On Mon, 2021-11-29 at 18:36 -0800, Eric Biggers wrote:
On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 12:00:53PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
quoted
Support for fs-verity file digests in IMA was discussed from the beginning,
prior to fs-verity being upstreamed[1,2].  This patch set adds signature
verification support based on the fs-verity file digest.  Both the
file digest and the signature must be included in the IMA measurement list
in order to disambiguate the type of file digest.

[1] https://events19.linuxfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/fs-verify_Mike-Halcrow_Eric-Biggers.pdf
[2] Documentation/filesystems/fsverity.rst

Mimi Zohar (4):
  fs-verity: define a function to return the integrity protected file
    digest
  ima: define a new signature type named IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG
  ima: limit including fs-verity's file digest in measurement list
  ima: support fs-verity file digest based signatures

 fs/verity/fsverity_private.h              |  6 ---
 fs/verity/measure.c                       | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/fsverity.h                  | 17 ++++++++
 security/integrity/ima/ima.h              |  3 +-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_api.c          | 23 ++++++++++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c     |  9 ++++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c         |  7 +++-
 security/integrity/ima/ima_template_lib.c |  3 +-
 security/integrity/integrity.h            |  1 +
 9 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
I left some comments, but this generally looks like the right approach.
However, I'm not an expert in IMA, so it's hard for me to review the IMA parts.
Thank you for the quick review!
Can you add documentation for this feature?
Yes, of course.  Originally I assumed the fs-verity support would be a
lot more complicated, but to my pleasant surprise by limiting the IMA
fsverity support to just signatures and requiring the file signature be
included in the IMA measurement list, it's a lot simpler than expected.
As there aren't any IMA policy changes, I'm just thinking about where
to document it.

thanks,

Mimi
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help