On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:56:25PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
Suggested-by: James Bottomley <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <redacted>
The commit message does not contain a description of what kind of code
change you're doing.
/Jarkko