Thread (9 messages) read the whole thread 9 messages, 4 authors, 2021-08-12

Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] tpm: ibmvtpm: Rename tpm_process_cmd to tpm_status and define flag

From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-08-11 02:10:37
Also in: linux-security-module, lkml

On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 09:50:55PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
On 8/10/21 1:58 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 03:21:59PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
quoted
From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>

Rename the field tpm_processing_cmd to tpm_status in ibmvtpm_dev and set
the TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag while the vTPM is busy processing a command.


  		default:
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
index 51198b137461..252f1cccdfc5 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ struct ibmvtpm_dev {
  	wait_queue_head_t wq;
  	u16 res_len;
  	u32 vtpm_version;
-	u8 tpm_processing_cmd;
+	u8 tpm_status;
+#define TPM_STATUS_BUSY		(1 << 0) /* vtpm is processing a command */
Declare this already in the fix, and just leave the rename here.
You mean the fix patch does not use 'true' anymore but uses the
TPM_STATUS_BUSY flag already but the name is still tpm_processing_cmd? And
literally only the renaming of this field is done in the 2nd patch?
I can fixup these patches, and use '1', instead of true. No need to send
new ones.

Acked-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>

/Jarkko
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help