Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 2 authors, 2021-06-10

Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Add support for ECDSA-signed kernel modules

From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Date: 2021-06-10 11:50:11
Also in: keyrings, linux-security-module, lkml

On 6/10/21 5:03 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 09, 2021 at 09:58:29AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
quoted
On 6/9/21 8:44 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 08:32:59AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
quoted
On 6/3/21 2:47 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
quoted
quoted
-- 
2.29.2
Please instead send a fix.
We have a Fixes tag in 1/2, so we want this to propagate to older kernels
and need the fix in 1/2 for that reason.

     Stefan
So please do an additional fix and send it.
1/2 is supposed to propagate to older kernels and needs to change as posted
here in v5 (assuming that this does indeed fix what the build bot was
complaining about). 2/2 also changes. A fix on top of v4 would fix 2/2 but
won't apply cleanly to 1/2 as cannot easily propagate to older kernels. Is
that what we want? Why can you not remove v4 from your queue and replace it
with v5?

    Stefan
What you can do is to send fix or fixes with appropriate fixes tags and
I can then squash them for appropriate patches. That's less work for me.

Once you squash a fix on top of existing 1/2 , existing 2/2 will not 
apply anymore. I am not sure what to send you. I think it would take 
less time to remove the existing 2 patches and replace them with v5.

    Stefan

Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help