Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized

[RFC PATCH 1/2] ima: don't access a file's integrity status before an IMA policy is loaded · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-19
[RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-19
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-03-22
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> · 2021-03-22
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-03-23
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-23
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-03-23
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-03-23
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-23
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-03-23
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-23
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-03-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> · 2021-03-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> · 2021-03-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> · 2021-03-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> · 2021-03-24
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] integrity: double check iint_cache was initialized · Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> · 2021-03-24

From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Date: 2021-03-23 15:15:19
Also in: linux-security-module, lkml

On 2021/03/23 23:47, Mimi Zohar wrote:

Initially I also questioned making "integrity" an LSM.  Perhaps it's
time to reconsider.   For now, it makes sense to just fix the NULL
pointer dereferencing.

Do we think calling panic() as "fix the NULL pointer dereferencing" ?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help