Thread (32 messages) 32 messages, 5 authors, 2021-01-06

Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash

From: Tushar Sugandhi <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-06 05:01:07
Also in: dm-devel, linux-security-module, lkml, selinux

<snip>
quoted
quoted
  void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void 
*buf, int size,
                  const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-                int pcr, const char *func_data);
+                int pcr, const char *func_data,
+                bool measure_buf_hash);
Please abbreviate the boolean name to "hash".   The test would then be
"if (hash == true)" or "if (hash)".
Will do.
<snip>
quoted
quoted
- * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer to ima log.
+ * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer or the buffer 
data hash
   * @inode: inode associated with the object being measured (NULL 
for KEY_CHECK)
   * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log.
   * @size: size of buffer(in bytes).
@@ -787,12 +787,23 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,
   * @func: IMA hook
   * @pcr: pcr to extend the measurement
   * @func_data: private data specific to @func, can be NULL.
+ * @measure_buf_hash: measure buffer hash
^@hash: measure buffer data hash
Agreed. Will fix.
<snip>
quoted
quoted
  void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void 
*buf, int size,
                  const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func,
-                int pcr, const char *func_data)
+                int pcr, const char *func_data,
+                bool measure_buf_hash)
  {
      int ret = 0;
      const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM";
@@ -807,6 +818,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode 
*inode, const void *buf, int size,
          struct ima_digest_data hdr;
          char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
      } hash = {};
+    char buf_hash[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE];
+    int buf_hash_len = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo];
      int violation = 0;
      int action = 0;
      u32 secid;
@@ -849,13 +862,27 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode 
*inode, const void *buf, int size,
          goto out;
      }
+    if (measure_buf_hash) {
^ if (hash) {
Yes.
quoted
quoted
+        memcpy(buf_hash, hash.hdr.digest, buf_hash_len);
+
+        ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(buf_hash, buf_hash_len,
+                       iint.ima_hash);
+        if (ret < 0) {
+            audit_cause = "measure_buf_hash_error";

Hi Mimi,
There already exist a local struct variable named "hash" in p_b_m().
I was thinking of using "buf_hash", but that one is taken too.
Maybe I should use "buf_hash" for the input bool, and rename the
existing "buf_hash" local variable to "digest_hash"?
Does it sound ok?

Thanks,
Tushar


<snip>
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help