Re: [PATCH v9 2/8] IMA: add support to measure buffer data hash
From: Tushar Sugandhi <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-06 05:01:07
Also in:
dm-devel, linux-security-module, lkml, selinux
<snip>
quoted
quoted
void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, - int pcr, const char *func_data); + int pcr, const char *func_data, + bool measure_buf_hash);Please abbreviate the boolean name to "hash". The test would then be "if (hash == true)" or "if (hash)".Will do.
<snip>
quoted
quoted
- * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer to ima log. + * process_buffer_measurement - Measure the buffer or the buffer data hash * @inode: inode associated with the object being measured (NULL for KEY_CHECK) * @buf: pointer to the buffer that needs to be added to the log. * @size: size of buffer(in bytes).@@ -787,12 +787,23 @@ int ima_post_load_data(char *buf, loff_t size,* @func: IMA hook * @pcr: pcr to extend the measurement * @func_data: private data specific to @func, can be NULL. + * @measure_buf_hash: measure buffer hash^@hash: measure buffer data hashAgreed. Will fix.
<snip>
quoted
quoted
void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode *inode, const void *buf, int size, const char *eventname, enum ima_hooks func, - int pcr, const char *func_data) + int pcr, const char *func_data, + bool measure_buf_hash) { int ret = 0; const char *audit_cause = "ENOMEM";@@ -807,6 +818,8 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode*inode, const void *buf, int size, struct ima_digest_data hdr; char digest[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; } hash = {}; + char buf_hash[IMA_MAX_DIGEST_SIZE]; + int buf_hash_len = hash_digest_size[ima_hash_algo]; int violation = 0; int action = 0; u32 secid;@@ -849,13 +862,27 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(struct inode*inode, const void *buf, int size, goto out; } + if (measure_buf_hash) {^ if (hash) {Yes.quoted
quoted
+ memcpy(buf_hash, hash.hdr.digest, buf_hash_len); + + ret = ima_calc_buffer_hash(buf_hash, buf_hash_len, + iint.ima_hash); + if (ret < 0) { + audit_cause = "measure_buf_hash_error";
Hi Mimi, There already exist a local struct variable named "hash" in p_b_m(). I was thinking of using "buf_hash", but that one is taken too. Maybe I should use "buf_hash" for the input bool, and rename the existing "buf_hash" local variable to "digest_hash"? Does it sound ok? Thanks, Tushar <snip>