Re: [PATCH] SELinux: Measure state and hash of policy using IMA
flat view
From: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-09-08 18:00:56
Also in:
linux-security-module, lkml, selinux
On Mon, Sep 7, 2020 at 5:39 PM Lakshmi Ramasubramanian [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
Critical data structures of security modules are currently not measured. Therefore an attestation service, for instance, would not be able to attest whether the security modules are always operating with the policies and configuration that the system administrator had setup. The policies and configuration for the security modules could be tampered with by rogue user mode agents or modified through some inadvertent actions on the system. Measuring such critical data would enable an attestation service to reliably assess the security configuration of the system. SELinux configuration and policy are some of the critical data for this security module that needs to be measured. This measurement can be used by an attestation service, for instance, to verify if the configuration and policies have been setup correctly and that they haven't been tampered with at runtime. Measure SELinux configuration, policy capabilities settings, and the hash of the loaded policy by calling the IMA hook ima_measure_critical_data(). Since the size of the loaded policy can be quite large, hash of the policy is measured instead of the entire policy to avoid bloating the IMA log. Enable early boot measurement for SELinux in IMA since SELinux initializes its state and policy before custom IMA policy is loaded. Sample measurement of SELinux state and hash of the policy: 10 e32e...5ac3 ima-buf sha256:86e8...4594 selinux-state-1595389364:287899386 696e697469616c697a65643d313b656e61626c65643d313b656e666f7263696e673d303b636865636b72657170726f743d313b6e6574776f726b5f706565725f636f6e74726f6c733d313b6f70656e5f7065726d733d313b657874656e6465645f736f636b65745f636c6173733d313b616c776179735f636865636b5f6e6574776f726b3d303b6367726f75705f7365636c6162656c3d313b6e6e705f6e6f737569645f7472616e736974696f6e3d313b67656e66735f7365636c6162656c5f73796d6c696e6b733d303 10 9e81...0857 ima-buf sha256:4941...68fc selinux-policy-hash-1597335667:462051628 8d1d...1834 To verify the measurement check the following: Execute the following command to extract the measured data from the IMA log for SELinux configuration (selinux-state). grep -m 1 "selinux-state" /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements | cut -d' ' -f 6 | xxd -r -p The output should be the list of key-value pairs. For example, initialized=1;enabled=1;enforcing=0;checkreqprot=1;network_peer_controls=1;open_perms=1;extended_socket_class=1;always_check_network=0;cgroup_seclabel=1;nnp_nosuid_transition=1;genfs_seclabel_symlinks=0; To verify the measured data with the current SELinux state: => enabled should be set to 1 if /sys/fs/selinux folder exists, 0 otherwise For other entries, compare the integer value in the files => /sys/fs/selinux/enforce => /sys/fs/selinux/checkreqprot And, each of the policy capabilities files under => /sys/fs/selinux/policy_capabilities For selinux-policy-hash, the hash of SELinux policy is included in the IMA log entry. To verify the measured data with the current SELinux policy run the following commands and verify the output hash values match. sha256sum /sys/fs/selinux/policy | cut -d' ' -f 1 grep -m 1 "selinux-policy-hash" /sys/kernel/security/integrity/ima/ascii_runtime_measurements | cut -d' ' -f 6 This patch is based on commit 66ccd2560aff ("selinux: simplify away security_policydb_len()") in "next" branch in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pcmoore/selinux.git This patch is dependent on the following patch series and must be applied in the given order: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11709527/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11730193/ https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11730757/ Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <redacted> Suggested-by: Stephen Smalley <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com> ---diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig index 953314d145bb..9bf0f65d720b 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig +++ b/security/integrity/ima/Kconfig@@ -324,8 +324,7 @@ config IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS config IMA_QUEUE_EARLY_BOOT_DATA bool - depends on IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS - depends on SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING + depends on (IMA_MEASURE_ASYMMETRIC_KEYS && SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING) || SECURITY_SELINUX default y
I don't see why this is necessary or desirable. We should avoid leaking dependencies on a single security module into other subsystems. It might not yet fully support other security modules but we shouldn't preclude adding that in the future. Up to the IMA maintainer but I would recommend dropping this part.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/security/selinux/include/security.h b/security/selinux/include/security.h index cbdd3c7aff8b..c971ec09d855 100644 --- a/security/selinux/include/security.h +++ b/security/selinux/include/security.h@@ -209,6 +209,11 @@ static inline bool selinux_policycap_genfs_seclabel_symlinks(void) return state->policycap[POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_GENFS_SECLABEL_SYMLINKS]; } +static inline bool selinux_checkreqprot(const struct selinux_state *state) +{ + return READ_ONCE(state->checkreqprot); +} +
Since you are introducing this helper, you should also convert existing reads of selinux_state.checkreqprot and fsi->state->checkreqprot to use it, and writes to use WRITE_ONCE() just like for enforcing and disabled. The introduction of the helper and conversion to use it could be done as a separate patch before this one.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/security/selinux/measure.c b/security/selinux/measure.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..caf9107937d9 --- /dev/null +++ b/security/selinux/measure.c
<snip>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+static int read_selinux_state(char **state_str, int *state_str_len, + struct selinux_state *state) +{ + char *buf, *str_fmt = "%s=%d;"; + int i, buf_len, curr;
<snip>
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ for (i = 0; i < __POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX; i++) { + buf_len += snprintf(NULL, 0, str_fmt, + selinux_policycap_names[i], + state->policycap[i]); + }
This will need to be converted to use security_policycap_supported(state, i) rather than state->policycap[i] since the latter is going to be removed by Ondrej's patches I think.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ for (i = 0; i < __POLICYDB_CAPABILITY_MAX; i++) { + curr += snprintf((buf + curr), (buf_len - curr), str_fmt, + selinux_policycap_names[i], + state->policycap[i]);
Ditto.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c index 45e9efa9bf5b..bb460954de03 100644 --- a/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c +++ b/security/selinux/selinuxfs.c@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ static ssize_t sel_write_enforce(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, from_kuid(&init_user_ns, audit_get_loginuid(current)), audit_get_sessionid(current)); enforcing_set(state, new_value); + selinux_measure_state(state, false);
I think we should move this to after the avc_ss_reset call so that we don't introduce a potentially long delay between setting the enforcing mode and flushing the AVC at least. Potentially it could be moved to the very end after selnl_notify_setenforce() too so that it doesn't delay notifying userspace, but that's less crucial.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
if (new_value) avc_ss_reset(state->avc, 0); selnl_notify_setenforce(new_value);@@ -761,6 +762,8 @@ static ssize_t sel_write_checkreqprot(struct file *file, const char __user *buf, fsi->state->checkreqprot = new_value ? 1 : 0;
This should switch to using WRITE_ONCE() or a helper that uses it.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/security/selinux/ss/services.c b/security/selinux/ss/services.c index 8dc111fbe23a..04a9c3d8c19b 100644 --- a/security/selinux/ss/services.c +++ b/security/selinux/ss/services.c@@ -3874,6 +3875,30 @@ int security_netlbl_sid_to_secattr(struct selinux_state *state, } #endif /* CONFIG_NETLABEL */ +/** + * security_read_selinux_policy - read the policy. + * @policy: SELinux policy + * @data: binary policy data + * @len: length of data in bytes + * + */ +static int security_read_selinux_policy(struct selinux_policy *policy, + void **data, size_t *len) +{
Since this only uses *data, why not just pass that here?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+ int rc; + struct policy_file fp; + + fp.data = *data; + fp.len = *len; + + rc = policydb_write(&policy->policydb, &fp); + if (rc) + return rc; + + *len = (unsigned long)fp.data - (unsigned long)*data; + return 0; +} + /** * security_read_policy - read the policy. * @data: binary policy data