Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor
From: Solar Designer <hidden>
Date: 2020-09-23 18:21:47
Also in:
linux-api, linux-arm-kernel, linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2020-09-27 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
- 2020-09-27 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
- 2020-09-26 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor · Arvind Sankar <hidden>
- 2020-09-25 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
- 2020-09-25 · Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] [RFC] Implement Trampoline File Descriptor · Madhavan T. Venkataraman <hidden>
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 08:00:07PM +0200, Solar Designer wrote:
A couple of other things Brad kindly pointed out: SELinux already has similar protections (execmem, execmod): http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0508.2/0194.html https://danwalsh.livejournal.com/6117.html
Actually, that's right in Madhavan's "Introduction": "LSMs such as SELinux implement W^X" and "The W^X implementation today is not complete." I'm sorry I jumped into this thread out of context. Alexander