Mickaël Salaün [off-list ref] writes:
From: Kees Cook <redacted>
Change uselib(2)' S_ISREG() error return to EACCES instead of EINVAL so
the behavior matches execve(2), and the seemingly documented value.
The "not a regular file" failure mode of execve(2) is explicitly
documented[1], but it is not mentioned in uselib(2)[2] which does,
however, say that open(2) and mmap(2) errors may apply. The documentation
for open(2) does not include a "not a regular file" error[3], but mmap(2)
does[4], and it is EACCES.
Do you have enough visibility into uselib to be certain this will change
will not cause regressions?
My sense of uselib is that it would be easier to remove the system call
entirely (I think it's last use was in libc5) than to validate that a
change like this won't cause problems for the users of uselib.
For the kernel what is important are real world users and the manpages
are only important as far as they suggest what the real world users do.
Eric
quoted hunk
[1] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/execve.2.html#ERRORS
[2] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/uselib.2.html#ERRORS
[3] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/open.2.html#ERRORS
[4] http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/mmap.2.html#ERRORS
Signed-off-by: Mickaël Salaün <mic@digikod.net>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <redacted>
Acked-by: Christian Brauner <redacted>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200605160013.3954297-2-keescook@chromium.org (local)
---
fs/exec.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index e6e8a9a70327..d7c937044d10 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -141,11 +141,10 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(uselib, const char __user *, library)
if (IS_ERR(file))
goto out;
- error = -EINVAL;
+ error = -EACCES;
if (!S_ISREG(file_inode(file)->i_mode))
goto exit;
- error = -EACCES;
if (path_noexec(&file->f_path))
goto exit;