Thread (61 messages) 61 messages, 10 authors, 2020-08-14

Re: [dm-devel] [RFC PATCH v5 00/11] Integrity Policy Enforcement LSM (IPE)

From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Date: 2020-08-05 23:52:27
Also in: dm-devel, linux-block, linux-fsdevel, linux-security-module, lkml

On Wed, 5 Aug 2020, Mimi Zohar wrote:
If block layer integrity was enough, there wouldn't have been a need
for fs-verity.   Even fs-verity is limited to read only filesystems,
which makes validating file integrity so much easier.  From the
beginning, we've said that fs-verity signatures should be included in
the measurement list.  (I thought someone signed on to add that support
to IMA, but have not yet seen anything.)

Going forward I see a lot of what we've accomplished being incorporated
into the filesystems.  When IMA will be limited to defining a system
wide policy, I'll have completed my job.
What are your thoughts on IPE being a standalone LSM? Would you prefer to 
see its functionality integrated into IMA?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help