On 25-05-29, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 29/05/2025 00:08, Marco Felsch wrote:

quoted

+maintainers:
+  - Marco Felsch [off-list ref]
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/input/touchscreen/touchscreen.yaml#
+  - $ref: /schemas/input/input.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: touchnetix,ax54a
+
+  reg:
+    enum: [ 0x66, 0x67 ]

Isn't this the same address? You just added the write bit.

No the i2c addresses are always the 7-bit i2c-addresses without the R/W
bit.

quoted

+
+  interrupts:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  reset-gpios:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  panel: true

So that was the reason of dropping tag?
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/821ce1d4-bc15-4764-bbe0-315c57e8536e@linaro.org/ (local)

Anyway, drop the property. Redundant.

Why is this redundant? The touchscreen.yaml defines it but I need to
request it? At least I understood it that way and all other users of
this property do it same way. Same is true for all the touchscreen-*
properties definied in touchscreen.yaml.

Regards,
  Marco