Thread (65 messages) 65 messages, 2 authors, 2024-09-04

Re: [PATCH v26 29/33] ALSA: usb-audio: qcom: Don't allow USB offload path if PCM device is in use

From: Wesley Cheng <hidden>
Date: 2024-09-03 23:43:56
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-doc, linux-sound, linux-usb, lkml

Hi Pierre,

On 8/30/2024 2:55 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
On 8/29/24 21:41, Wesley Cheng wrote:
quoted
Add proper checks and updates to the USB substream once receiving a USB QMI
stream enable request.  If the substream is already in use from the non
offload path, reject the stream enable request.  In addition, update the
USB substream opened parameter when enabling the offload path, so the
non offload path can be blocked.

Signed-off-by: Wesley Cheng <redacted>
---
 sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c b/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
index e9f2fd6bbb41..0bd533f539e4 100644
--- a/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
+++ b/sound/usb/qcom/qc_audio_offload.c
@@ -1482,12 +1482,17 @@ static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
 		goto response;
 	}
 
+	mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
 	if (req_msg->enable) {
-		if (info_idx < 0 || chip->system_suspend) {
+		if (info_idx < 0 || chip->system_suspend || subs->opened) {
 			ret = -EBUSY;
+			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
+
 			goto response;
 		}
+		subs->opened = 1;
 	}
+	mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
 
 	if (req_msg->service_interval_valid) {
 		ret = get_data_interval_from_si(subs,
@@ -1509,6 +1514,11 @@ static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
 		if (!ret)
 			ret = prepare_qmi_response(subs, req_msg, &resp,
 						   info_idx);
+		if (ret < 0) {
+			mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
+			subs->opened = 0;
+			mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
+		}
 	} else {
 		info = &uadev[pcm_card_num].info[info_idx];
 		if (info->data_ep_pipe) {
@@ -1532,6 +1542,9 @@ static void handle_uaudio_stream_req(struct qmi_handle *handle,
 		}
 
 		disable_audio_stream(subs);
+		mutex_lock(&chip->mutex);
+		subs->opened = 0;
+		mutex_unlock(&chip->mutex);
 	}
 
This sounds ok but I wonder why all this needs to be done in
Qualcomm-specific layers instead of soc-usb?
This is to prevent conflicts within the non-offload/legacy USB SND path and the USB SND offload vendor driver.  Don't think we need to involve anything with ASoC in these checks.

Thanks

Wesley Cheng
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help