Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] dt-bindings: firmware: add i.MX95 SCMI Extension protocol

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:49:59PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:

quoted

Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] dt-bindings: firmware: add i.MX95 SCMI
Extension protocol

On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:18:28PM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:

quoted

quoted

Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] dt-bindings: firmware: add i.MX95

SCMI

quoted

quoted

Extension protocol

On 18/07/2024 09:41, Peng Fan (OSS) wrote:

quoted

From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

Add i.MX SCMI Extension protocols bindings for:
- Battery Backed Module(BBM) Protocol
  This contains persistent storage (GPR), an RTC, and the ON/OFF

button.

quoted

  The protocol can also provide access to similar functions

implemented via

quoted

  external board components.
- MISC Protocol.
  This includes controls that are misc settings/actions that must
be

exposed

quoted

  from the SM to agents. They are device specific and are usually

define to

quoted

  access bit fields in various mix block control modules,
IOMUX_GPR,

and

quoted

  other GPR/CSR owned by the SM.

Reviewed-by: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>

Why quotes? Which tools did you use?

I could not recall why have this. I will drop and resend the patchset.

Resend only if you have any other comments addressed, no spin just
for this one please.

Sorry, I pushed the button too quick to send out v7(just correct
this R-b tag and rebased to linux-next) before checking my inbox.

Just makes me wonder if I should wait for 3-4 pings + 2-3 weeks after the
last version of any of your patch set without any version bump before I
can look at it. Otherwise it is quite impossible to match your speed of
patch respinning and the whole review process gets complicated to follow.

Also it is bit sad that you thought it needs to be re-spinned just for this
which can be easily fixed when applying. Also I haven't even started looking
at this series for the reason I mentioned above.

--
Regards,
Sudeep