On 11/8/23 20:53, Rob Herring wrote:

On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 9:57 AM Jiri Valek - 2N [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Separate IRQ parsing is not necessary, I2C core do the job.

Signed-off-by: Jiri Valek - 2N <redacted>
---
 drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c
index 4711ea985627..ccca9936ef25 100644
--- a/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c
+++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/cap11xx.c

@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ static int cap11xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c_client)
        struct device *dev = &i2c_client->dev;
        struct cap11xx_priv *priv;
        const struct cap11xx_hw_model *cap;
-       int i, error, irq;
+       int i, error;
        unsigned int val, rev;

        if (id->driver_data >= ARRAY_SIZE(cap11xx_devices)) {

@@ -624,13 +624,7 @@ static int cap11xx_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c_client)
        if (error)
                return error;

-       irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(dev->of_node, 0);

Probably can drop the include of of_irq.h as well.

Ack. Thanks for notice!