Re: [PATCH v8 3/3] HID: cp2112: Fwnode Support
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2023-03-06 13:07:29
Also in:
linux-devicetree
On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 01:36:51PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 11:49 AM Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 06:06:06PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:quoted
On Mar 01 2023, Andy Shevchenko wrote:quoted
On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 01:05:54PM -0600, Daniel Kaehn wrote:
... [1]: https://stackoverflow.com/a/60855157/2511795
quoted
quoted
Thanks Andy for your help here, and thanks for that link. I am trying to test Danny's patch as I want to use it for my HID CI, being an owner of a CP2112 device myself. The current setup is using out of the tree patches [2] which are implementing a platform i2c-hid support and some manual addition of a I2C-HID device on top of it. This works fine but gets busted every now and then when the tree sees a change that conflicts with these patches. So with Danny's series, I thought I could have an SSDT override to declare that very same device instead of patching my kernel before testing it. Of course, it gets tricky because I need to run that under qemu. I am currently stuck at the "sharing the firmware_node from usb with HID" step and I'd like to know if you could help me. On my laptop, if I plug the CP2112 (without using a USB hub), I can get: $> ls -l /sys/bus/hid/devices/0003:10C4:EA90.* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Mar 2 17:02 /sys/bus/hid/devices/0003:10C4:EA90.0079 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb2/2-9/2-9:1.0/0003:10C4:EA90.0079 $> ls -l /sys/bus/usb/devices/2-9*/firmware_node lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Mar 2 17:03 /sys/bus/usb/devices/2-9:1.0/firmware_node -> ../../../../../LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:15/device:16/device:25 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Mar 2 17:02 /sys/bus/usb/devices/2-9/firmware_node -> ../../../../LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:15/device:16/device:25 So AFAIU the USB device is properly assigned a firmware node. My dsdt also shows the "Device (RHUB)" and I guess everything is fine.Yes, so far so good.quoted
However, playing with qemu is not so easy. I am running qemu with the following arguments (well, almost because I have a wrapper script on top of it and I also run the compiled kernel from the current tree): #> qemu-system-x86_64 -bios /usr/share/edk2/ovmf/OVMF_CODE.fd \ -netdev user,id=hostnet0 \ -device virtio-net-pci,netdev=hostnet0 \ -m 4G \ -enable-kvm \ -cpu host \ -device qemu-xhci -usb \ -device 'usb-host,vendorid=0x10c4,productid=0xea90' \ -cdrom ~/Downloads/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-37-1.7.isoSide question, where can I get those blobs from (EDKII and Fedora Live CD)? I'm using Debian unstable.You can install the ovmf package in debian[3], which should have a similar file. For the Fedora livecd -> https://getfedora.org/fr/workstation/download/ but any other distribution with a recent enough kernel should show the same.
Thank you!
quoted
quoted
And this is what I get: #> ls -l /sys/bus/hid/devices/0003:10C4:EA90.* lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 2 16:10 /sys/bus/hid/devices/0003:10C4:EA90.0001 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:06.0/usb2/2-1/2-1:1.0/0003:10C4:EA90.0001 #> ls -l /sys/bus/usb/devices/2-1*/firmware_node ls: cannot access '/sys/bus/usb/devices/2-1*/firmware_node': No such file or directory Looking at the DSDT, I do not see any reference to the USB hub, so I wonder if the firmware_node needs to be populated first in the DSDT.So, where QEMU takes DSDT (ACPI tables in general) from? Can you patch that? I believe that's the problem in qemu.That's a good question and it's one I am not sure I have the answer to. I would have assumed that the DSDT was in the OVMF firmware, but given that we can arbitrarily add command line arguments, I believe it probably just provides a baseline and then we are screwed. The OVMF bios is compiled only once, so I doubt there is any mechanism to enable/disable a component in the DSDT, or make it dynamically generated.
We have two ways of filling missing parts: 1) update the original source of DSDT (firmware or bootloader, whichever provides that); 2) adding an overlay. The 2) works _if and only if_ there is *no* existing object in the tables. In such cases, you can simply provide a *full* hierarchy. See an example of PCI devices in the kernel documentation on how to do that. I believe something similar can be done for USB.
quoted
quoted
Also note that if I plug the CP2112 over a docking station, I lose the firmware_node sysfs entries on the host too.This seems like a lack of firmware node propagating in the USB hub code in the Linux kernel.That would make a lot of sense. FWIW, in the VM I see a firmware node on the pci controller itself: #> ls -l /sys/devices/pci0000\:00/0000\:00\:06.0/firmware_node lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 0 Mar 6 12:24 /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:06.0/firmware_node -> ../../LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A03:00/device:07 And one the host, through a USB hub: #> ls -l /sys/bus/hid/devices/0003:10C4:EA90.* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Mar 6 13:26 /sys/bus/hid/devices/0003:10C4:EA90.007C -> ../../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:14.0/usb2/2-8/2-8.2/2-8.2.4/2-8.2.4:1.0/0003:10C4:EA90.007C #> ls -l /sys/bus/usb/devices/2-8*/firmware_node lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Mar 2 16:53 /sys/bus/usb/devices/2-8:1.0/firmware_node -> ../../../../../LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:15/device:16/device:1e lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 0 Mar 2 16:53 /sys/bus/usb/devices/2-8/firmware_node -> ../../../../LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/PNP0A08:00/device:15/device:16/device:1e Note that the firmware node propagation stopped at 2-8, and 2.8.2 is not having a firmware node.
It would be nice if you can run `grep -H 15 /sys/bus/acpi/devices/*/status`, filter out unneeded ones, and for the rest also print their paths: `cat filtered_list_of_acpi_devs | while read p; do grep -H . $p/path; done` With this we will see what devices are actually present and up and running in the system and what their paths in the ACPI namespace.
quoted
quoted
Do you think it would be achievable to emulate that over qemu and use a mainline kernel without patches?As long as qemu provides correct DSDT it should work I assume.Just to be sure I understand, for this to work, we need the DSDT to export a "Device(RHUB)"?
Not sure I understand the term "export" here. We need a description of the (to describe) missing parts.
Or if we fix the USB fw_node propagation, could we just overwrite "\_SB_.PCI0.S30_"? "\_SB_.PCI0.S30_" is the name the ACPI is giving to the USB port in my VM case AFAIU.
I have no idea what is the S30 node. [2] https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/bentiss/gitlab-kernel-ci/-/tree/master/VM [3] https://packages.debian.org/buster/all/ovmf/filelist -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko