On Fri, 23 Sep 2022, Basavaraj Natikar wrote:

Add a check for num_hid_devices to handle special case in the situation
of "no sensors" for SFH1.1.

Could you please provide a little bit more verbose changelog here? Namely, 
what problem does it cause when we don't return ENODEV in 
!cl_data->num_hid_devices case (and thus why this patch is needed in the 
first place).

Thanks.

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs