Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2022-06-30

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: adc-joystick: add poll-interval

From: Chris Morgan <hidden>
Date: 2022-06-27 22:42:01
Also in: linux-devicetree, linux-iio

On Mon, Jun 27, 2022 at 11:33:28PM +0100, Paul Cercueil wrote:
Hi Chris,

Le lun., juin 27 2022 at 17:14:42 -0500, Chris Morgan
[off-list ref] a écrit :
quoted
Add poll-interval support for the adc-joystick documentation. This is
an optional value and if not provided the adc-joystick works as it
does today (with triggered buffers). If this value is provided, the
adc-joystick driver is polled at the specified interval.

Signed-off-by: Maya Matuszczyk <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Chris Morgan <redacted>
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
index 2ee04e03bc22..2d755091e46d 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/adc-joystick.yaml
@@ -18,6 +18,12 @@ properties:
   compatible:
     const: adc-joystick

+  poll-interval:
+    description:
+      Poll interval time in milliseconds. If not specified, device will
use
+      triggered buffer.
It doesn't have to use *triggered* buffer - it can use regular buffer as
well.

The property should use a unit suffix, as explained here:
https://nam12.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fdevicetree-org%2Fdt-schema%2Fblob%2Fmain%2Fdtschema%2Fschemas%2Fproperty-units.yaml&amp;data=05%7C01%7C%7Cf6306210eda84b58f7f408da588d1627%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637919660856597552%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=NVqhWKdycQsv0ksiILD8aH%2BnZ6aji%2BhNxSEwBkQlZC0%3D&amp;reserved=0

So it should be named poll-interval-ms.

Cheers,
-Paul
Understood, though the logic here was to be consistent with existing
implementations (such as adc-keys and gpio-keys-polled) which all
use poll-interval (no ms). Honest question, would it be better to be
right (poll-interval-ms) or consistent (poll-interval) in this case?

Thank you.
quoted
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+
   io-channels:
     minItems: 1
     maxItems: 1024
--
2.34.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help