Re: Upstream support of Google Chromebook keyboards (udev, xkeyboard-config)?
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2022-01-04 00:00:24
Also in:
lkml
Hi Paul, On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 05:18:44PM +0100, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear Linux folks, Installing a non-Chromium OS distribution like Debian on a Google Chromebook, in this case a Dell Latitude 5400 Chrome (google/sarien), not all keys work as expected.
Looking at the issues you are referencing you are flashing a 3rd party firmware on the device so I am unable to comment on behavior of that firmware, however:
1. Non-working super key and two function keys on Google Chromebook Dell Latitute 5400 Chrome (google/sarien) [1]
There is no "super" key on Chromebooks. The "globe" key you see is supposed to select next keyboard layout. This is the udev hwdb entry that we have for Sarien/Arcada devices in our tree: # Copyright 2019 The Chromium OS Authors. All rights reserved. # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 # # Special keyboard mapping for the Sarien project. The keyboard emits both # function and action scan codes depending on Fn-modifier key. evdev:atkbd:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnDell*:pnSarien:pvr* evdev:atkbd:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnDell*:pnArcada:pvr* KEYBOARD_KEY_ea=back KEYBOARD_KEY_e7=refresh KEYBOARD_KEY_d5=full_screen KEYBOARD_KEY_d6=scale KEYBOARD_KEY_95=brightnessdown KEYBOARD_KEY_91=brightnessup KEYBOARD_KEY_a0=mute KEYBOARD_KEY_ae=volumedown KEYBOARD_KEY_b0=volumeup KEYBOARD_KEY_8b=switchvideomode KEYBOARD_KEY_d8=sleep KEYBOARD_KEY_d4=kbd_layout_next (Note that on Chrome OS we are transitioning from F1-F10 being primary key codes emitted by the kernel to what we call "action" codes - back, refresh, etc).
2. Wrong caps lock key and function key mappings on Google Chromebook Dell Latitute 5400 Chrome (google/sarien) [2]
There is no CapsLock on Chromebooks either. We are using "search" or "launcher" key which is actually Left Meta in place of CapsLock.
Peter replied, this should be fixed in udev, so it’s not directly related to
the Linux kernel, as the Linux kernel exposes the scancodes(?) just fine.
But what is the upstream process for this in general? Chromium OS carries
`91-chromeos-keyboard.rules` for example.
systemd/udev currently has an entry for two Google Chromebook models in
`hwdb.d/60-keyboard.hwdb` [4]:
######################### FIXED MODEL DEVICES
#############################
# This section lists devices which require special handling in their key
# code to keysym mapping by setting the xkb model.
# The model must be an xkb compatible model (defined with
XKB_FIXED_MODEL).
# Chromebooks
evdev:atkbd:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnHewlett-Packard*:pnFalco:pvr*
evdev:atkbd:dmi:bvn*:bvr*:bd*:svnAcer*:pnPeppy:pvr*
XKB_FIXED_MODEL="chromebook"Yes, that is the right place for it. You submit a PR against systemd with the new mappings.
The Dell Chromebooks, unfortunately, also use the embedded controller with
Dell’s proprietary firmware (Wilco(?)), and not Chrome EC making special
handling necessary. `91-chromeos-keyboard.rules` has
# Wilco keyboard (5220W-C) for Chrome OS
SUBSYSTEM=="input", \
ATTRS{idVendor}=="413c", ATTRS{idProduct}=="2510", \
ENV{CROS_KEYBOARD_TOP_ROW_LAYOUT}="3", \
ENV{ID_INPUT_KEYBOARD}="1"This is only needed on Chrome OS to let Chrome know how to map the "action" scancodes back to F1-F10 when they are chorded with "launcher" key. This is Chrome on Chrome OS-specfic behavior and is of no interest to other parties. Thanks. -- Dmitry