On Nov 8, 2021, at 4:37 PM, Joe Perches [off-list ref] wrote:
On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 16:22 -0800, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
So it's an exploder not an actual maintainer and it likely isn't
publically archived with any normal list mechanism.
So IMO "private" isn't appropriate. Neither is "L:"
Perhaps just mark it as what it is as an "exploder".
Or maybe these blocks should be similar to:
M: Name of Lead Developer [off-list ref]
M: VMware <foo> maintainers <linux-<foo>-maintainers@vmlinux.com>
Maybe something like a comment mechanism should be added to the
MAINTAINERS file.
Maybe #
so this entry could be something like:
M: VMware <foo> maintainers <linux-<foo>-maintainers@vmlinux.com> # VMware's ever changing internal maintainers list
Admittedly, I do not care much about how it turns to be.
But if it is modified, it should be very clear who the maintainer
is, and not to entangle the mailing list and the maintainer.
I am personally not subscribed to the internal pv-drivers mailing
list, which is not just for memory ballooning, and is also listed
as a maintainer for vmmouse, pvscsi, vmxnet3 and others.
As I am the only maintainer of VMware balloon, if someone is
mistaken and sends an email only to the mailing list and not me,
he might be disappointed.