On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 09:51:54AM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 10:04:16PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
quoted
Hi Oleksij,
On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 02:41:15PM +0200, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
quoted
Fix warning reported by the kernel test robot:
drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c:705:24: warning: taking address
of packed member 'data' of class or structure 'ads7846_buf' may result
in an unaligned pointer value [-Waddress-of-packed-member]
Fixes: 6965eece2a89 ("Input: ads7846 - convert to one message")
Reported-by: kernel test robot <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
index adb4c2230c31..1987dedac94f 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ads7846.c
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static int ads7846_get_value(struct ads7846_buf *buf)
{
int value;
- value = be16_to_cpup(&buf->data);
+ value = get_unaligned_be16(&buf->data);
ds7846_buf is declared as packed so I believe using be16_to_cpu(buf->data)
will suffice.
The pointer to the data is is off by 8 bits, so it is not naturally
aligned. This is why we need to use function which is dealing with
unaligned pointers.
As I mentioned, the structure is packed, so the compiler will take care
of doing unaligned access safely on architectures that can not tolerate
it.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry