Thread (17 messages) 17 messages, 2 authors, 2021-08-31

Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] Input: ili210x - export ili251x version details via sysfs

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-08-30 21:01:53

On Fri, Aug 27, 2021 at 11:12:57PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
The ili251x firmware protocol permits readout of firmware version,
protocol version, mcu version and current mode (application, boot
loader, forced update). These information are useful when updating
the firmware on the il251x, e.g. to avoid updating the same firmware
into the device multiple times. The locking is now necessary to avoid
races between interrupt handler and the sysfs readouts.

Note that the protocol differs considerably between the ili2xxx devices,
this patch therefore implements this functionality only for ili251x that
I can test.

Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Hung <redacted>
Cc: Luca Hsu <redacted>
---
V2: No change

NOTE: Regarding checkpatch warnings, Consider renaming function(s)
      'ili251x_firmware_version_show' to 'firmware_version_show',
      I considered it and decided against it, because grepping for
      ili251x in debug symbols gives far more accurate results than
      grepping for firmware_version.
Yep, I completely agree here. I wish checkpatch did not complain about
this.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
 drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c | 130 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 127 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
index c46553ecabe6..7790ad000dc1 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ili210x.c
@@ -22,6 +22,12 @@
 /* Touchscreen commands */
 #define REG_TOUCHDATA		0x10
 #define REG_PANEL_INFO		0x20
+#define REG_FIRMWARE_VERSION	0x40
+#define REG_PROTOCOL_VERSION	0x42
+#define REG_KERNEL_VERSION	0x61
+#define REG_IC_MODE		0xc0
+#define REG_IC_MODE_AP		0x5a
+#define REG_IC_MODE_BL		0x55
 #define REG_CALIBRATE		0xcc
 
 struct ili2xxx_chip {
@@ -43,6 +49,7 @@ struct ili210x {
 	struct input_dev *input;
 	struct gpio_desc *reset_gpio;
 	struct touchscreen_properties prop;
+	struct mutex lock;
 	const struct ili2xxx_chip *chip;
 	bool stop;
 };
@@ -307,7 +314,9 @@ static irqreturn_t ili210x_irq(int irq, void *irq_data)
 	int error;
 
 	do {
+		mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
 		error = chip->get_touch_data(client, touchdata);
+		mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
 		if (error) {
 			dev_err(&client->dev,
 				"Unable to get touch data: %d\n", error);
@@ -351,6 +360,108 @@ static int ili251x_firmware_update_resolution(struct device *dev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static ssize_t ili251x_firmware_version_show(struct device *dev,
+					     struct device_attribute *attr,
+					     char *buf)
+{
+	struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
+	struct ili210x *priv = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
+	u8 fw[8];
+	int ret;
+
+	/* Get firmware version */
+	mutex_lock(&priv->lock);
+	ret = priv->chip->read_reg(client, REG_FIRMWARE_VERSION,
+				   &fw, sizeof(fw));
+	mutex_unlock(&priv->lock);
Could we query firmware version and mode at probe time (and also later
after firmware update attempt) so that we do not need to introduce
locking against interrupt handler?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!ret) {
+		ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
+				"%02x%02x.%02x%02x.%02x%02x.%02x%02x\n",
+				fw[0], fw[1], fw[2], fw[3],
+				fw[4], fw[5], fw[6], fw[7]);
+	}
I think there is sysfs_emit() that is preferred now.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help