Re: [PATCH] drivers/input: Remove all strcpy() uses in favor of strscpy()
From: Kees Cook <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-02 16:17:27
Also in:
linux-hardening, lkml
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 10:19:07AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 09:44:33AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:quoted
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 05:57:32PM +0200, Len Baker wrote:quoted
Hi, On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 04:00:00PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:quoted
On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 04:43:16PM +0200, Len Baker wrote:quoted
strcpy() performs no bounds checking on the destination buffer. This could result in linear overflows beyond the end of the buffer, leading to all kinds of misbehaviors. The safe replacement is strscpy(). Signed-off-by: Len Baker <redacted> --- This is a task of the KSPP [1] [1] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88 drivers/input/keyboard/locomokbd.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/locomokbd.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/locomokbd.c index dae053596572..dbb3dc48df12 100644 --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/locomokbd.c +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/locomokbd.c@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int locomokbd_probe(struct locomo_dev *dev) locomokbd->suspend_jiffies = jiffies; locomokbd->input = input_dev; - strcpy(locomokbd->phys, "locomokbd/input0"); + strscpy(locomokbd->phys, "locomokbd/input0", sizeof(locomokbd->phys));So if the string doesn't fit, it's fine to silently truncate it?I think it is better than overflow :)quoted
Rather than converting every single strcpy() in the kernel to strscpy(), maybe there should be some consideration given to how the issue of a strcpy() that overflows the buffer should be handled. E.g. in the case of a known string such as the above, if it's longer than the destination, should we find a way to make the compiler issue a warning at compile time?Good point. I am a kernel newbie and have no experience. So this question should be answered by some kernel hacker :) But I agree with your proposals. Kees and folks: Any comments? Note: Kees is asked the same question in [2] [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210731135957.GB1979@titan/ (local)Hi! Sorry for the delay at looking into this. It didn't use to be a problem (there would always have been a compile-time warning generated for known-too-small cases), but that appears to have regressed when, ironically, strscpy() coverage was added. I've detailed it in the bug report: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/88 So, bottom line: we need to fix the missing compile-time warnings for strcpy() and strscpy() under CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE=y.Is it possible to have them warn always? Or that would be too many false positives?
There are actually no false positives right now (they were all fixed before FORTIFY_SOURCE landed). Enabling it by default would likely mean splitting compile-time checks from run-time checks... I'm kind of already doing this in the recent memcpy() strictness series[1], so ... maybe? I think I'd like to land the memcpy() series first, then we can revisit making it always warn.
quoted
In the past we'd tried to add a stracpy()[1] that would only work with const string sources. Linus got angry[2] about API explosion, though, so we're mostly faced with doing the strscpy() replacements.I would like to have an API that would do compile-time checks and BUILD_BUG_ON() for a few places in input drivers where we copy constant strings. There is no reason to encumber the code with runtime checks, and bombing out on compile instead of truncating would be nice.
In theory, this is provided by CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE, though a recent change broke a specific instance. I've added tests for this now to the memcpy() series, and will get it fixed in there too.
quoted
Another idea might be to have strcpy() do the "constant strings only" thing, leaving strscpy() for the dynamic lengths. One thing is clear: replacing strlcpy() with strscpy() is probably the easiest and best first step to cleaning up the proliferation of str*() functions.OK, so the consensus is that we set this patch aside as it does not really fix any issues (the strcpy() destination is 32 bytes and is big enough to hold the string being copied)?
I think that's fair. -Kees [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210727205855.411487-1-keescook@chromium.org/ (local) -- Kees Cook