Re: [PATCH V3 4/5] dt-bindings: input: pm8941-pwrkey: Convert pm8941 power key binding to yaml
From: <hidden>
Date: 2021-06-02 10:31:57
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-devicetree, linux-pm, lkml
On 2021-06-02 10:07, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 10:17:43AM +0530, skakit@codeaurora.org wrote:quoted
On 2021-05-10 21:54, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Mon, May 10, 2021 at 09:01:39AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:quoted
On Mon, 10 May 2021 12:31:03 +0530, satya priya wrote:quoted
Convert qcom pm8941 power key binding from .txt to .yaml format. Signed-off-by: satya priya <redacted> --- Changes in V2: - Fixed bot errors, took reference from input.yaml for "linux,code" - Added one complete example for powerkey and resin, and referenced it in main PON binding. - Moved this patch to the end of the series. Changes in V3: - Moved this patch before PON binding patch. - As per Rob's comments, added allOf at the beginning of binding. Added maxItems for interrupts. - Added 'unevaluatedProperties' instead of 'additionalProperties' as we are using allOf. .../bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.txt | 55 -------------- .../bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.yaml | 87 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.txt create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.yamlMy bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/qcom,pm8941-pwrkey.example.dt.yaml:0:0: /example-0/spmi@c440000/pmic@0/pon_hlos@1300: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,pm8998-pon']You have the same example in patch 5, so drop the example here. That will fix this circular dependency.Earlier I have dropped example from qcom-pon.yaml. Now, I will add the example there and drop here.It sounds to me you want to combine patches 4 and 5 since they depend on each other.
No, the idea was to have one complete example, instead of bits. So, initially I have removed the example part from qcom-pon.yaml and added full example here, but it was causing a circular dependency issue. Rob suggested to move it back to qcom-pon.yaml to fix issue. I have posted V4 making that change. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1425638/ Thanks, Satya Priya
Thanks.