Thread (9 messages) 9 messages, 6 authors, 2021-05-13

Re: [PATCH 2/2] HID: hid-sensor-custom: Process failure of sensor_hub_set_feature()

From: Benjamin Tissoires <hidden>
Date: 2021-05-05 13:28:22
Also in: linux-iio, lkml

On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:38 PM Jiri Kosina [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
quoted
When user modifies a custom feature value and sensor_hub_set_feature()
fails, return error.

Reported-by: Abaci Robot <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
---
Replaces patch: HID: hid-sensor-custom: remove useless variable
by Jiapeng Chong [off-list ref]

 drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
index 2628bc53ed80..58b54b127cdf 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/hid-sensor-custom.c
@@ -406,6 +406,8 @@ static ssize_t store_value(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
                                                              report_id;
              ret = sensor_hub_set_feature(sensor_inst->hsdev, report_id,
                                           index, sizeof(value), &value);
+             if (ret)
+                     return ret;
What tree is this patch against? In my tree, we're not even assigning
sensor_hub_set_feature() return value to anything.
I guess there was a "collision". At roughly the same time I merged
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-input/list/?series=456269
people were starting to send various patches for the same thing.

Srinivas, either the change in for-next (and probably Linus' master
now) is fine, or could you rebase on top of hid.git?

Cheers,
Benjamin
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help