Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition | linux-input | Ratatoskr

[PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition · Uwe Kleine-König <hidden> · 2021-02-06
[PATCH v1 2/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Simplify logic in ishtp_cl_device_remove() · Uwe Kleine-König <hidden> · 2021-02-06
[PATCH v1 3/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Make remove callback return void · Uwe Kleine-König <hidden> · 2021-02-06
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition · Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition · Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition · Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition · Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> · 2021-03-08
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition · Uwe Kleine-König <hidden> · 2021-05-10
Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition · Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> · 2021-05-13

Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] HID: intel-ish-hid: Drop if block with an always false condition

From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Date: 2021-03-08 16:04:42
Also in: lkml

On Mon, 2021-03-08 at 11:07 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:

On Sat, 6 Feb 2021, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

quoted

A remove callback is only ever called for a bound device. So there
is no
need to check for device or driver being NULL.

Srinivas, any objections to this patchset? The cleanups look good to
me.

Sorry, I missed this series.
No objection for taking these patches.

Thanks,
Srinivas

Thanks,