On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 09:09:27PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

Hey Greg,

On Fri, Dec 04, 2020 at 03:58:17PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 12:47:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:

quoted

The driver core ignores the return value of struct device_driver::remove
because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to
make this function return void, let struct sa1111_driver::remove return
void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes
it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and ensures future
users behave accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <redacted>

Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

Thanks, can I interpret this also as an Ack to take the change affecting
drivers/usb via Russell's tree?

Sorry, yes, that is what I was implying here, I should have been more
specific.

thanks,

greg k-h