Re: [RFC 0/3] HID: logitech-dj: Dinovo keyboard fixes and improvements
From: Hans de Goede <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-19 15:54:15
Hi, On 11/19/20 4:52 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 4:48 PM Hans de Goede [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi, On 11/19/20 4:25 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:quoted
Hi Hans, On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 10:21 PM Hans de Goede [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi Benjamin, Here is my patch series for the discussed Dinovo keyboard (receiver) support improvements. I've marked this as a RFC since it has not been tested with a Dinovo Mini (nor a Dinovo Mini receiver) yet. I have tested it extensively with a Dinovo Edge, a MX5000 and a MX5500 keyboard. In case of the Dinovo Edge and MX5000 I've not only tested them against their own receiver but also against each-others receiver. Once you have tested this series on your Dinovo Mini, it is ready to go upstream.That part is now done, so I guess we can push it upstream :)Great thank you.quoted
FTR, the dinovo mini still works fine with this series. I have a weird issue where the secondary button gives me a left click, but according to the raw logs, this is emitted from the hardware itself and is the same whether I am on hid-logitech-dj or not.A bit offtopic for this thread, but if it is a HID++ 1.0 device, then you could try setting the HIDPP_QUIRK_HIDPP_EXTRA_MOUSE_BTNS quirk on it and see if that helps. I've seen several cases with HID++ 1.0 devices where some keyboard-keys / buttons would not report (or report wrongly) unless the reporting of them was switched over from the regular HID input report to the HID++ version of the report.I'll have to test this, yes. Thanks.quoted
quoted
quoted
The first patch should probably go to 5.10 as a fix in case someone pairs the Dinovo Mini with a MX5x00 receiver like the reporter of this bug did with his Dinovo Edge: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811424OK, then I can apply it on top of the previous fix. I guess we don't need stable@vger.k.o for this one?Actually this is intended for stable, to avoid getting a repeat of: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1811424 with a Dinovo Mini. So if you can add a Cc: stable that would be great.Oops, I have already pushed it without the tag. I guess we can always request it later...
No problem, the Fixes tag which it has alone should be enough for it to get picked into the stable series. Regards, Hans