RE: [PATCH 1/6] Input: adp5589: use a single variable for error in probe
From: Ardelean, Alexandru <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-12 06:51:10
Also in:
lkml
From: Ardelean, Alexandru <hidden>
Date: 2020-11-12 06:51:10
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Ardelean, Alexandru Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 8:40 AM To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/6] Input: adp5589: use a single variable for error in probequoted
-----Original Message----- From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2020 2:38 AM To: Ardelean, Alexandru <redacted> Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Input: adp5589: use a single variable for error in probe [External] Hi Alexandru, On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:48:28AM +0200, Alexandru Ardelean wrote:quoted
The 'error' & 'ret' variables are used. This is a bit of duplication. This change replaces the use of error with the 'ret' variable since the name is a bit more generic.I really prefer variables that carry error codes/success and are used in error paths to be called "error", and "ret" or "retval" to be used in cases where we may return actual data.Ack. Will do it the other way around for v2.
Wait. I just had some coffee. I think you're saying to drop this patch. Also fine from my side.
quoted
Thanks. -- Dmitry