Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties'

[PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: additional/unevaluatedProperties clean-ups · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
[PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> · 2020-10-07
Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add missing 'unevaluatedProperties' · Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> · 2020-10-07
[PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: Use 'additionalProperties' instead of 'unevaluatedProperties' · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: Use 'additionalProperties' instead of 'unevaluatedProperties' · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: Use 'additionalProperties' instead of 'unevaluatedProperties' · Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: Use 'additionalProperties' instead of 'unevaluatedProperties' · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: Use 'additionalProperties' instead of 'unevaluatedProperties' · Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: Use 'additionalProperties' instead of 'unevaluatedProperties' · Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> · 2020-10-06
[PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in board/SoC schemas · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in board/SoC schemas · Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in board/SoC schemas · Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in board/SoC schemas · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2020-10-06
[PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> · 2020-10-05
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Lee Jones <hidden> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Ulf Hansson <hidden> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@Huawei.com> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> · 2020-10-06
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> · 2020-10-07
Re: [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: Explicitly allow additional properties in common schemas · Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com> · 2020-10-07
Re: [PATCH 0/4] dt-bindings: additional/unevaluatedProperties clean-ups · Srinivas Kandagatla <hidden> · 2020-10-06

From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Date: 2020-10-05 20:03:06
Also in: dmaengine, dri-devel, linux-can, linux-clk, linux-devicetree, linux-gpio, linux-hwmon, linux-i2c, linux-ide, linux-iio, linux-leds, linux-media, linux-mips, linux-mmc, linux-pci, linux-pm, linux-pwm, linux-riscv, linux-rtc, linux-serial, linux-spi, linux-usb, linux-watchdog, lkml

On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:38:27PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:

This doesn't yet do anything in the tools, but make it explicit so we can
check either 'unevaluatedProperties' or 'additionalProperties' is present
in schemas.

Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>

Attachments

signature.asc [application/pgp-signature] 488 bytes

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help