On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 23:30:03 +0200
Alexandre Belloni [off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Jonathan,

On 12/07/2020 14:35:34+0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:

quoted

On Mon,  6 Jul 2020 13:43:42 +0200
Kamel Bouhara [off-list ref] wrote:
  

quoted

Hello,

Here is a new counter driver to support Microchip TCB capture devices.

Each SoC has two TCB blocks, each one including three independent
channels.The following series adds support for two counter modes:
increase and quadrature decoder.

As for the atmel clocksource and pwm, the counter driver needs to fill
some tcb capabilities in order to operate with the right configuration.
This is achieved in first patch of this series.

Please feel free to comment.  

As far as I can see we have all the necessary acks etc and it looks
good to me as well.

Shall I do an immutable branch with the whole lot or should we split it
up?  Patches 1 and 5 need to go through the same tree, but bindings
could go via another route.  I'm also fine if the whole lot goes
via the appropriate soc tree if that is easier.
  

I think the best would be an immutable branch as I have another series
that depends on the three preliminary patches that should go through the
clocksource/tip tree this cycle:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200710230813.1005150-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com/ (local)

I've pushed applied the patches to an immutable branch
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git/log/?h=ib-5.8-tcb
and merged that into the togreg branch of iio.git which is pushed out as testing or
the autobuilders to play with it.

Thanks,

Jonathan