Thread (2 messages) 2 messages, 2 authors, 2020-01-21

Re: [PATCH v2] Input: pm8xxx-vib - fix handling of separate enable register

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2020-01-21 04:44:42

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 07:34:42PM +0100, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
Setting the vibrator enable_mask is not implemented correctly:

For regmap_update_bits(map, reg, mask, val) we give in either
regs->enable_mask or 0 (= no-op) as mask and "val" as value.
But "val" actually refers to the vibrator voltage control register,
which has nothing to do with the enable_mask.

So we usually end up doing nothing when we really wanted
to enable the vibrator.

We want to set or clear the enable_mask (to enable/disable the vibrator).
Therefore, change the call to always modify the enable_mask
and set the bits only if we want to enable the vibrator.

Cc: Damien Riegel <redacted>
Fixes: d4c7c5c96c92 ("Input: pm8xxx-vib - handle separate enable register")
Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>
Applied, thank you.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11286073/
Changes in v2:
 - Changed regmap_update_bits(..., regs->enable_mask, on ? regs->enable_mask : 0)
   to regmap_update_bits(..., regs->enable_mask, on ? ~0 : 0)
     (suggested by Dmitry Torokhov)
---
 drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
index ecd762f93732..53ad25eaf1a2 100644
--- a/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
+++ b/drivers/input/misc/pm8xxx-vibrator.c
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static int pm8xxx_vib_set(struct pm8xxx_vib *vib, bool on)
 
 	if (regs->enable_mask)
 		rc = regmap_update_bits(vib->regmap, regs->enable_addr,
-					on ? regs->enable_mask : 0, val);
+					regs->enable_mask, on ? ~0 : 0);
 
 	return rc;
 }
-- 
2.24.1
-- 
Dmitry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help