Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] Introduce STPMIC1 PMIC Driver
From: Lee Jones <hidden>
Date: 2019-01-16 08:14:04
Also in:
linux-devicetree, linux-watchdog, lkml
On Mon, 14 Jan 2019, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 12:47:01PM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:quoted
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, Pascal PAILLET-LME wrote:quoted
The goal of this patch-set is to propose a driver for the STPMIC1 PMIC from STMicroelectronics. The STPMIC1 regulators supply power to an application processor as well as to external system peripherals such as DDR, Flash memories and system devices. It also features onkey button input and an hardware watchdog. The STPMIC1 is controlled via I2C. Main driver is drivers/mfd/stpmic1 that handle I2C regmap configuration and irqchip. stpmic1_regulator, stpmic1_onkey and stpmic1_wdt need stpmic1 mfd as parent. STPMIC1 MFD and regulator drivers maybe mandatory at boot time. Pascal Paillet (7): changes in v7: * rebase on regul/for-next dt-bindings: mfd: document stpmic1 mfd: stpmic1: add stpmic1 driver dt-bindings: input: document stpmic1 pmic onkey input: stpmic1: add stpmic1 onkey driver dt-bindings: watchdog: document stpmic1 pmic watchdog watchdog: stpmic1: add stpmic1 watchdog driver regulator: stpmic1: fix regulator_lock usageCould you please remove any patches which have been applied and [RESEND]? Also, is Dmitry planning on Acking: dt-bindings: input: document stpmic1 pmic onkey ... or is Rob's Ack enough?For bindings I normally defer to Rob (unless I see something that really bugs me and then I'll speak up).
I usually do the opposite. Seeing as Rob is pretty heavily laden with DT patches, I tend to review/apply patches which do not add new DT properties and/or are obvious/trivial and leave Rob to the rest. Your train-set though of course, your decision. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog