Thread (6 messages) 6 messages, 2 authors, 2018-10-04

Re: [PATCH V2] hid: hid-core: Fix a sleep-in-atomic-context bug in __hid_request()

From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Date: 2018-09-29 19:20:15
Also in: lkml

On Sat, 29 Sep 2018, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
quoted
quoted
picolcd_send_and_wait (acquire a spinlock)
   hid_hw_request
     __hid_request
       hid_alloc_report_buf(GFP_KERNEL)

picolcd_reset (acquire a spinlock)
   hid_hw_request
     __hid_request
       hid_alloc_report_buf(GFP_KERNEL)

lg4ff_play (acquire a spinlock)
   hid_hw_request
     __hid_request
       hid_alloc_report_buf(GFP_KERNEL)

lg4ff_set_autocenter_ffex (acquire a spinlock)
   hid_hw_request
     __hid_request
       hid_alloc_report_buf(GFP_KERNEL)
Hm, so it's always drivers calling out into core in atomic context. So
either we take this, and put our bets on being able to allocate the buffer
without sleeping,
In my opinion, I prefer this way.
Why? Forcing all the report buffer to be limited to be non-sleeping 
allocations just because of two drivers, looks like an overkill, and 
actually calls for more issues (as GFP_ATOMIC is of course in principle 
less likely to succeed).

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help