Hi,
On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 08:48:58PM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In the example for the pwm-vibrator bindings, pwm8 is the direction pin,
and pwm9 is the enable pin. The pwms on the vibrator node has these two
values swapped so this patch corrects it.
Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <redacted>
---
Changes since v1:
- Swapped the pwms values instead of the pwm-names values since enable
is required and direction is optional. Based on feedback from
Rob Herring.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
index 09145d18491d..88c775a3fe21 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/pwm-vibrator.txt
@@ -58,8 +58,8 @@ Example from Motorola Droid 4:
vibrator {
compatible = "pwm-vibrator";
- pwms = <&pwm8 0 1000000000 0>,
- <&pwm9 0 1000000000 0>;
+ pwms = <&pwm9 0 1000000000 0>,
+ <&pwm8 0 1000000000 0>;
pwm-names = "enable", "direction";
direction-duty-cycle-ns = <1000000000>;
};
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Reichel <redacted>
-- Sebastian