Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Remove false-positive VLAs when using max()
From: Josh Poimboeuf <hidden>
Date: 2018-03-17 22:55:24
Also in:
lkml, netdev
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 01:07:32PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 11:52 AM, Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
So the above is completely insane, bit there is actually a chance that using that completely crazy "x -> sizeof(char[x])" conversion actually helps, because it really does have a (very odd) evaluation-time change. sizeof() has to be evaluated as part of the constant expression evaluation, in ways that "__builtin_constant_p()" isn't specified to be done. But it is also definitely me grasping at straws. If that doesn't work for 4.4, there's nothing else I can possibly see.No luck! :( gcc 4.4 refuses to play along. And, hilariously, not only does it not change the complaint about __builtin_choose_expr(), it also thinks that's a VLA now. ./include/linux/mm.h: In function ‘get_mm_hiwater_rss’: ./include/linux/mm.h:1567: warning: variable length array is used ./include/linux/mm.h:1567: error: first argument to ‘__builtin_choose_expr’ not a constant 6.8 is happy with it (of course). I do think the earlier version (without the sizeof-hiding-builting_constant_p) provides a template for a const_max() that both you and Rasmus would be happy with, though!
I thought we were dropping support for 4.4 (for other reasons). Isn't it 4.6 we should be looking at? -- Josh