On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:59:56 +0200
Wolfram Sang [off-list ref] wrote:
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Makes sense as do the other drivers.
Feel free to add
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
to all of them (though they hardly took a lot of reviewing given how simple
the patches were :)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
index 6f638bbc922db4..bbc7aadb4c899d 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-dev.c
@@ -280,6 +280,8 @@ static noinline int i2cdev_ioctl_rdwr(struct i2c_client *client,
res = PTR_ERR(rdwr_pa[i].buf);
break;
}
+ /* memdup_user allocates with GFP_KERNEL, so DMA is ok */
+ rdwr_pa[i].flags |= I2C_M_DMA_SAFE;
/*
* If the message length is received from the slave (similar