Re: [PATCH v2] Input: adxl34x - fix gcc-7 -Wint-in-bool-context warning
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-09-20 19:14:03
Also in:
lkml
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2017-09-20 19:14:03
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 01:43:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
FIFO_MODE is an macro expression with a '<<' operator, which
gcc points out could be misread as a '<':
drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c: In function 'adxl34x_probe':
drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c:799:36: error: '<<' in boolean context, did you mean '<' ? [-Werror=int-in-bool-context]
This converts the test to an explicit comparison with FIFO_BYPASS,
making it clearer to gcc and the reader what is intended.
Fixes: e27c729219ad ("Input: add driver for ADXL345/346 Digital Accelerometers")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
v2: use FIFO_BYPASS instead of 0Applied, thank you.
drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c b/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c index 2b2d02f408bb..a3e79bf5a04b 100644 --- a/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/adxl34x.c@@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ struct adxl34x *adxl34x_probe(struct device *dev, int irq, if (pdata->watermark) { ac->int_mask |= WATERMARK; - if (!FIFO_MODE(pdata->fifo_mode)) + if (FIFO_MODE(pdata->fifo_mode) == FIFO_BYPASS) ac->pdata.fifo_mode |= FIFO_STREAM; } else { ac->int_mask |= DATA_READY;-- 2.9.0
-- Dmitry