Thread (53 messages) 53 messages, 6 authors, 2017-03-14

Re: [PATCH v2] Input: silead - Do not try to directly access the GPIO when using ACPI pm

From: Hans de Goede <hidden>
Date: 2017-03-09 18:48:11

Hi,

On 09-03-17 15:45, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,

On 09-03-17 15:03, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 2017-03-09 at 14:57 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
quoted
Hi,

On 08-03-17 19:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
<snip soc_button_array stuff>
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
I think that "extcon: int3496: Add GPIO ACPI mapping
table"
will
need
a similar change (I haven't tested it yet).
So I assume you want to do the same (pass NULL as con-id to
gpiod_get_index()) for the extcon-in3496 driver or do you want
to keep the GPIO ACPI mapping table there?
A slightly preferable table variant (needs to be fixed I guess)
because
initial one used to have different labels.
Ok, I will test with the acpi-mapping table then and if necessary
create a fixup patch for it and send that to you.
Sounds like a plan!

Since extcon patches are landed already mainstream it might make sense
to send it as usual to all maintainers.
Ack, so to be clear we should use gpiod_get not gpiod_get_index with
the acpi mapping table, right ? The reason I'm asking is that my
test devices only have the id pin which has index 0 so in my
experience with soc_button_array it will work with both
(the button with index 0 would even work with gpiod_get_index).
Ok, so there is one problem with the extcon-intel-int3496.c
together with your gpio patches:

[ 2382.484415] gpio gpiochip1: (INT33FF:01): gpiochip_lock_as_irq: tried to flag a GPIO set as output for IRQ
[ 2382.484425] gpio gpiochip1: (INT33FF:01): unable to lock HW IRQ 3 for IRQ
[ 2382.484429] genirq: Failed to request resources for INT3496:00 (irq 174) on irqchip chv-gpio
[ 2382.484518] intel-int3496 INT3496:00: can't request IRQ for USB ID GPIO: -22
[ 2382.500359] intel-int3496: probe of INT3496:00 failed with error -22

This can be fixed / worked around by doing this:

--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-intel-int3496.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-intel-int3496.c
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static int int3496_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                 dev_err(dev, "can't request USB ID GPIO: %d\n", ret);
                 return ret;
         }
+       gpiod_direction_input(data->gpio_usb_id);

         data->usb_id_irq = gpiod_to_irq(data->gpio_usb_id);
         if (data->usb_id_irq < 0) {
But the gpio is requested as:

         data->gpio_usb_id = devm_gpiod_get(dev, "id", GPIOD_IN);

Note the GPIOD_IN I think the new behavior is caused by:

https://bitbucket.org/andy-shev/linux/commits/ba458eb945879a66eac75de69a4e7312c4f44cc7

Of which I'm not sure it is a good idea, as the dsdt of my
cube iwork8 air shows:

         Device (OTG2)
         {
             Name (_HID, "INT3496")  // _HID: Hardware ID
             Name (_CID, "INT3496")  // _CID: Compatible ID

Method (_CRS, 0, NotSerialized)  // _CRS: Current Resource Settings
{
     Name (ABUF, ResourceTemplate ()
     {
         GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
             "\\_SB.GPO1", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
             )
             {   // Pin list
                 0x0003
             }
         GpioIo (Exclusive, PullDefault, 0x0000, 0x0000, IoRestrictionOutputOnly,
             "\\_SB.GPO3", 0x00, ResourceConsumer, ,
             )
             {   // Pin list
                 0x002E
             }
     })
     Return (ABUF) /* \_SB_.PCI0.OTG2._CRS.ABUF */
}

}

The dstd-s out there in the wild do not always get this right.

With my workaround from above the extcon-intel-int3496 driver
does work properly again, so I see 2 options here:

1) Let drivers workaround known broken IoRestriction in dstd-s
by using gpiod_direction_...

2) Drop the patch which makes gpiod_get honor the IoRestrictions

I've also tested the silead driver and with the new more strict
gpio code it works as it should as-is (as expected).

Regards,

Hans
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help