Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen, input: try to read screen resolution for xen-kbdfront
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Date: 2017-01-27 08:14:45
Also in:
lkml
On 27/01/17 08:53, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
On 01/27/2017 09:46 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:quoted
On 27/01/17 08:21, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:quoted
On 01/27/2017 09:12 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:quoted
Instead of using the default resolution of 800*600 for the pointing device of xen-kbdfront try to read the resolution of the (virtual) framebuffer device. Use the default as fallback only. Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> --- V2: get framebuffer resolution only if CONFIG_FB (Dmitry Torokhov) --- drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c | 15 ++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.cb/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c index 3900875..3aae9b4 100644--- a/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c +++ b/drivers/input/misc/xen-kbdfront.c@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/errno.h> #include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/fb.h> #include <linux/input.h> #include <linux/slab.h> @@ -108,7 +109,7 @@ static irqreturn_t input_handler(int rq, void*dev_id) static int xenkbd_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, const struct xenbus_device_id *id) { - int ret, i; + int ret, i, width, height; unsigned int abs; struct xenkbd_info *info; struct input_dev *kbd, *ptr;@@ -173,9 +174,17 @@ static int xenkbd_probe(struct xenbus_device *dev, ptr->id.product = 0xfffe; if (abs) { + width = XENFB_WIDTH; + height = XENFB_HEIGHT; +#ifdef CONFIG_FB + if (registered_fb[0]) {This still will not help if FB gets registered after kbd+ptrHmm, so you think I should add a call to fb_register_client() to get events for new registered framebuffer devices?yes, but also pay attention to CONFIG_FB_NOTIFY: you may still end up w/o notification.
Okay, that's not worse than today.
quoted
This would probably work. I'll have a try. Thanks, JuergenMy bigger concern here is that we try to tie keyboard and pointer device to the framebuffer. IMO, these are independent parts of the system and the relation depends on the use-case. One can have graphics enabled w/o framebuffer at all, e.g. DRM/KMS + OpenGLES + Weston + kbd + ptr...
Again: that's a use case which will work as today. The current defaults are being used. The question is whether we should add a module parameter switching off the automatic adaption of the resolution as there might be use cases where we don't want this feature. Juergen